The continuation of biblical prophecy runs like a thread from Jesus through Mani to Muhammad. And yet this thread, arguably the single most important characteristic of the Abrahamic movement, often remains outside the mainstream, hidden, as it were, since it generates heresy.

The figures of the Gnostic, the Holy man, and the mystic are allsequels of the Israelite prophet.

They reflect a mode of religiosity that is characterized by high intensity.

It is centripetal and activist by nature and emphasizes sectarianism and polemics, esoteric knowledge, or gnosis and charisma.

The other mode of religiosity, obviously much more common thanthe first one, is centrifugal and irenic.

It favours an ecumenical attitude, contents itself with a widely shared faith, or pistis, and reflects, in Weberian parlance, the routinisation of the new religious movement.

This is the mode of priests and bishops, rather than that of martyrs and holy men.

These two main modes of religion, high versus low intensity, exist simultaneously, and cross the boundaries of religious communities.

They offer a tool permitting us to follow the transformations ofreligion in late antiquity in general, and in ancient Christianity in particular, without becoming prisoners of the traditional categories of Patristic literature.

Through the dialectical relationship between these two modes of religiosity, one can follow the complex transformations of ancientChristianity in its broad religious context.